🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.